PUSHBACK Broadcast journalist Atom Araullo shows reporters a copy of his complaint for civil damages against Lorraine Marie Badoy and Jeffrey Celiz for Red-tagging him and his family.  —LYN RILLON

MANILA, Philippines — Broadcast journalist Atom Araullo won in the civil suit he filed against former anti-insurgency task force spokesperson Lorraine Badoy and confessed ex-communist rebel Jeffrey Celiz after being red-tagged as a member of the communist movement.

“Red-tagging is, by itself, a manifestation of bad faith. By engaging in red-tagging, the defendants acted grossly and recklessly without regard for truth,” Quezon City Regional Trial Court Branch 306 Presiding Judge Dolly Rose Bolante-Prado said in a 27-page order dated Dec. 12, 2024.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Atom Araullo sues Badoy, Celiz for P2M over red tagging

FEATURED STORIES NEWSINFO Bar exam 2024: List of successful examinees NEWSINFO Bar exam result 2024: 3,962 passed – Supreme Court NEWSINFO Acop: Quad comm uncovers Duterte’s link to 'grand criminal enterprise'

The court ordered Badoy and Celiz to jointly and severally pay a total of P2.07 million for violating several provisions of the Civil Code.

READ: Pushback against Red-tagging 

Article continues after this advertisement

The award for damages was based on Articles 19, 20, 21, 26, and 33 of the New Civil Code, which protects an individual’s rights, human relations, and dignity, and a violation could lead to serious damage and injury to a person’s reputation, peace of mind, and personal relations.

Article continues after this advertisement

Araullo complained about defamatory statements by Badoy and Celiz against him and his family on national television and social media platforms.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I am doing this for the safety and well-being of my family, but I also hope it contributes a modest way to protecting press freedom in general,” Araullo said when he filed the complaint.

slot 777 online

The broadcaster and his mother, Carol P. Araullo, chair emeritus of the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan), have been the subject of a red-tagging spree by Badoy and Celiz since 2022 in their show Laban Kasama ng Bayan over Sonshine Media Network International (SMNI).

Article continues after this advertisement

Araullo was branded as a “spawn” of an active CPP central committee leader. He was also accused as an orchestrator of attacks against the government by stating that the documentaries/content he produced were aligned with the propaganda of the CPP-NPA.

The grand opening of the 60-hectare Domaine Evremond vineyard, situated on a quiet hillside in Kent, received the royal seal of approval, with the Duchess of Edinburgh Sophie in attendance.

The stimulus announced by the central bank come after warnings that more state support was needed to get the world’s second-largest economy back on track and hit growth targets for 2024.

The court said engaging in red-tagging is a deliberate act to discredit and inflict harm on the broadcaster.

“Their remarks were aimed at damaging the plaintiff’s reputation and credibility, both as a person and as a journalist, by associating him with the CPP-NPA-NDF without proof,” the court said.

It added, “These labels and remarks went beyond mere editorial opinion or fair commentary and, worse, incited backlash, threats, and public hatred toward the plaintiff.”

While it is true that Araullo is a public figure, being a journalist and TV personality, the court said he is still protected by Article 26 by pointing out that his image and reputation are essential to his career.

“Defendants’ wrongful actions have caused damage and injury to his dignity, personality, privacy, and peace of mind,” the court said.

Regarding defamation, under Article 33 of the New Civil Code, specifically on malice, the court said Araullo should not be burdened with the duty of proving malice when in the first place, Badoy and Celiz did not present evidence to prove their claims.

Meanwhile, Celiz made a statement that called the court’s decision a “miscarriage of justice.”

He said the court held them in default due to the one-day delay in submitting their pre-trial brief.

“The regional trial court proceeded to have the hearings on this particular civil case without us being given the chance to present our evidence, our testimonies, and witnesses,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again. Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

SIGN ME UP

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Celiz said this is just a temporary setbackagilaplay, and they will file an appeal against the court’s decision.

READ NEXT Second-time Bar exam taker says first try a ‘lesson lear... 1-Pacman Rep. Romero levels up military reservists’ moves fo... EDITORS' PICK 1-Pacman leader levels up military reservists’ moves for service to nation Jericho Rosales raves over Janine Gutierrez’s calendar girl stint Manila Water brings Christmas joy to Ipo Watershed community Bianca Bustamante wraps up F1 Academy journey LIVE UPDATES: Bar exam results 2024 Bar exam result 2024: 3,962 passed – Supreme Court MOST READ Over 13,000 poll aspirants registered for digital election campaigns Bar exam 2024: List of successful examinees Bar exam result 2024: 3,962 passed – Supreme Court More foreign brands seen coming to PH shores in 2025 Follow @FMangosingINQ on Twitter --> View comments